| In the latter part
of 2004, Perks Davis (the strategic alliance
between Davis & Associates and Perks
Design Partners), presented a lunchtime
seminar for APSMA in Sydney on “The
Art of Effective Tender Documentation”.
Given the considerable investment made
by services organisatons in tendering, we
summarise key points from this seminar for
our newsletter subscribers:
Tender Documents - 9 Common
Problems
• Documents are too features rather
than benefit-focused
• Generic content: lack of delineation
around client/prospect needs & critical
business issues
• Don’t meet specific information
requests (i.e. non-compliant)
• Documents - overly wordy, repetitious
• Lack of strong, concise Executive
Summaries
• CVs – inconsistent, not sufficiently
tailored or benefit-oriented
• Frequent claims & assertions
without credible substantiation
• Lack of personalisation
• Lack of visual relief / techniques.
Getting the Fundamentals Right
• At its core, the tender document
is a piece of “sales communication”
• The Value Proposition (should permeate
the document) and needs to be concise and
consistent. Three core elements underpin
a Value Proposition:
1. Differentiates your organisation (i.e.
it distinguishes you in a way that is
relevant to your market)
2. Resonates with clients / prospects
(i.e. incorporates client benefits)
3. It’s credible – your organisation
can reliably deliver on it.
• The document shows a strong understanding
of client / prospect needs
• It is interesting to read (impactful
language, visually appealing)
• It is easy to read and comprehend
• It is easy to navigate
• Differentiating – in it’s
message, language and look.
Brand Alignment
• The tender document needs to be
consistent with your organisation’s
brand strategy (in particular, it must reinforce
and support your core brand positioning
and brand personality).
Key Drivers in Tender Decision-Making
Research shows that the key drivers in tender
decision-making, include:
• Demonstrated understanding of a
client/prospect’s industry & business
• Strong service delivery & ethos
• Possessing the required technical
expertise
• Delivering genuine “value
for money”.
Document Structure
• While many government & corporate
tenders stipulate a tight structure, where
that structure is not so fixed, it should
reflect the key drivers (and thus influences)
for tender decision–making. For example,
a suggested ordering would be:
| 1. |
Executive
Summary =
Value Proposition
|
| 2. |
Understanding
Your Industry-Business =
Meeting Your Needs / Industry Expertise
|
| 3. |
Service
Delivery =
Our Team / short-form CVs for key
people |
| 4. |
Technical
Expertise =
e.g. Audit / Risk Management methodologies |
| 5. |
Value
for Money =
Fees
|
• Other standard sections –
“Adding Value”, “Firm
Resources & Capabilities”, “Firm
Policies”, “Detailed CVs”
– should ideally appear in the latter
part of a tender document.
• Finally, include a Document
Content Checklist (i.e. summary of
information in the document & corresponding
page / section numbers), both for reader
navigation and quality control (compliance
with information requests).
Document Content
In terms of content, undertake the following
checks:
CHECK – that what truly differentiates
your organisation (i.e. your Value Proposition)
is reinforced throughout the entirety of
the document.
CHECK – that the document consistently
demonstrates an understanding of specific
client/prospect needs and key business issues.
CHECK – that content is tailored to
the organisation and the industry (e.g.
refer to information provided during meetings
& briefings, refer to decision-makers
by name and specifically acknowledge their
needs, incorporate your own research on
industry trends/drivers/developments).
CHECK – that you haven’t recited
features but, rather, demonstrated how your
organisations’ resources and capabilities
provide tangible benefits and meaningful
outcomes.
CHECK – for excessive wordiness and
repetition (e.g. use impactful wording,
short sentence structures, short-form communication
techniques – diagrams, breakout quotes,
testimonials).
CHECK – for unsubstantiated claims
and assertions (e.g. “We are a leading..”
“We have the best people...”,
“Our culture is unique...”,
“We are experts..”). Rather,
use 3rdd party endorsements, client testimonials,
independent surveys and case studies to
highlight expertise and capabilities.
Tone of Voice
• Write about your organisations’
services, products, experience and capabilities
from a client-benefit perspective (i.e.
“what’s in it for them”).
• Personalisation – use “you”,
“our” and “we” to
connote partnering and involvement; refer
to key decision-makers by name (creates
a sense of already working together).
• Use impactful language –
avoid clichés and jargon, wherever
possible. To this end, generate word lists
for use in tenders – reflecting vibrant,
fresh language.
• Copy templates are most appropriate
for more ‘generic’ sections
/ content (e.g. firm & office profiles,
industry client lists & assignments
/ projects, practice profiles, firm procedures
& processes) and small-medium sized
tenders.
Visual Tone of Voice
• Consider how much of the client/prospect
visual identity you want to
acknowledge
• Consider reader ease of navigation
• Establish a consistent typographic
hierarchy (headings, sub-headings)
• Photography should be of quality
and consistent with your brand values
• Avoid clip art, low quality stock
photography, visual clichés (e.g.
“shaking hands”)
Covers
• Consider the wrapping / cover –
customised, one-off covers & binding
• Use every opportunity to demonstrate
your brand values (paper stock, dividers,
binding methods, die cuts, e-versions)
Tender Presentation Levels
Develop different presentation levels, from
generic through to customised:
We suggest three levels:
|
Precedent-driven
Standard corporate
covers & dividers
Can be built
by anybody within your organisation
|
 |
Precedent-driven,
with some customised elements
Content built
internally, with limited external
advice
|
 |
Fully customised
Built in high-end
publishing program
E-printed or
offset, depending on volume
|
Typography
• Typography is a critical tool for
conveying visual identity. Key considerations
include:
- Corporate typefaces vs. system fonts
- Balance & scale of different typefaces
- Legibility & readability.
Tender Toolkit Checklist
Build a visual toolkit that covers:
• Typefaces
• Typographic hierarchy
• Typographic styles (e.g. caps, sentence
case etc)
• Colour palettes (primary & secondary)
• Image library
• Team photography
• Diagrams (charts, tables, diagram
styles)
• E-versions – pdf, html
• Template styles & precedents
• Graphic elements – wallpapers,
textures, illustrations, symbols
• Bullets & indents
• Breakout boxes, quotes, pullouts
& testimonials
• Covers, dividers, binding.
For a full copy of our seminar presentation,
go to our website at www.davismarketing.com.au
– and in “In the News”
section see under ”Speeches”.
|